• Subscribe
  • Magazine
  • 40 Under 40
  • Supplier's Directory
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
    1. Bus
    2. Infrastructure

    Study from Pioneer Institute finds BRT can offer cost-effective benefits

    Feb. 9, 2022
    The study highlights successful local pilot programs that show how BRT merits thoughtful expansion.
    Related To: Pioneer Institute
    Pioneer Institute
    Pioneer Institute Mbta Brt 6203f2860380b

    A new study published by Pioneer Institute provides insight into how bus rapid transit’s (BRT) unique features provide reliable and cost-effective service while reducing congestion and its detrimental environmental impacts. 

    BRT includes many features normally associated with subways, such as same-level boarding, automated fare collection, bus stations with turnstiles or fare gates, faster boarding and priority in traffic. In Brazil, the cost of assembling one BRT system was 50 times less than building a new subway system, according to the study “Bus Rapid Transit: Costs and Benefits of a Transit Alternative.” 

    “Three Boston-area pilot projects that incorporate BRT features on existing bus routes reinforce the idea that this is a promising approach that should be expanded,” said study co-author Ian Ollis. 

    After queue jumping, a practice where buses receive advanced green lights from the boarding lane at traffic signals between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. weekdays, a dedicated lane was added to the route along Massachusetts Avenue between Arlington and Porter Square in Cambridge. As a result, there was 64 percent less variance against the timetable and commutes were shortened by an average of 10 percent. Fifty-eight percent of residents supported extending the route and 70 percent supported making the changes permanent. 

    Along the 71 and 73 bus routes in Cambridge and Watertown, Mass., only three percent of the vehicles on the road are publicly operated, but six out of 10 commuters on the route ride those vehicles.  When bus lanes and signal timing were added, variance against the timetable dropped by 69 percent and the percentage of residents who approved of Mt. Auburn Street traffic patterns rose by 38 points. 

    The most ambitious pilot was in Everett, which added a 1.1-mile bus lane along Broadway, as well as first-step level boarding platforms that eliminate one step for boarding buses. Sixty percent of residents are satisfied with the lane and 77 percent want it to continue to Sullivan Square. 

    All three communities have made the changes permanent, and Everett Mayor Carlo DeMaria has set a goal of having full BRT in Everett by 2023. 

    In its 2019 final report, the Lower Mystic Regional Working Group, which was assembled by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation to support new transportation interventions for redevelopment, called for more BRT, finding that changes associated with BRT are faster to implement than other options, reduce automobile traffic and promote transit equity. 

    In Cleveland, Ohio, the 6.9-mile HealthLine was declared to have the most return on investment of any transit project by the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, which has created a set of BRT standards. One study found that two thirds of the jobs created in Cuyahoga County, which includes Cleveland, are located within a block of a HealthLine station. 

    Ollis and co-author Collin Quigley noted that compromises are often needed to balance competing interests and gain community support. They note that the bus lanes along Broadway in Everett are only used during peak hours, with the space used for parking at other times. 

    The study can be downloaded for free on Pioneer Institute’s website.